With two decades across capital markets - as an equity analyst, then in fund manager research, and now building a wealth practice of my own - I’ve seen how often financial advice defaults to a bigger number instead of a better question.

Indian health insurance has genuinely improved - wider hospital networks, faster cashless claims, bigger sums insured than a decade ago. That progress is real. But eventually, protection needs more than a bigger number. It needs an answer for why the bill got that large in the first place.

Buy a bigger sum insured and treat that as the finished job, and you haven’t managed your risk - you’ve outsourced your attention. You’ve quietly decided price no longer matters, on a bill you’ll never actually see, and handed away the one thing that used to discipline a hospital’s pricing: someone checking it.

It’s an easy habit to fall into, because the features on offer are genuinely appealing - unlimited restoration benefits, no-claim bonuses that double your cover for free, critical illness riders that pay out the moment you’re diagnosed. Each one sounds like protection. Each one is also a lever someone else gets to pull.

Four things actually decide what a policy is worth to you: who’s checking the price while the bill is being run up, how fast that price is allowed to move before anyone questions it, what the policy actually promises once it’s tested rather than what the brochure implies, and how much of your premium is simply funding a system with no brake left in it. Most people only ever weigh the first of the four - the sum insured - and never get to the other three.

A question I hear often: if the premium is affordable and the sum insured is generous, why does any of this matter?

Open any personal finance column on health insurance and you’ll find the same story wearing different clothes. Someone hears about a relative who got hit with a massive hospital bill. So they buy a much bigger cover for themselves. It gets written up as smart planning.

Here’s the advice, stripped down: costs are going up, so buy a bigger number. That’s not an explanation. It’s surrender (pun intended) dressed up as strategy. It treats hospital bills like weather - something that just happens - instead of asking who’s setting the price, and why.

So let’s ask the question the industry doesn’t. Once you’re holding a big enough cover, do you check the bill line by line?

Most people don’t. Why would you - you’re not the one paying it. Checking a hospital bill while someone you love is in a ward is a genuinely unreasonable thing to ask of anyone, which is exactly why nobody does it - and exactly why the price stops being checked by the one person who used to have a reason to check it. Once a hospital knows the patient in front of it isn’t going to push back on price, why would it hold the price down? Nobody set out to make this happen.

Take the patient out of the conversation about price, and there’s no brake on it anymore. That’s one real reason costs keep climbing - rarely, if ever, the one you’ll read about in newspaper columns.

Watch where it goes next. Bills go up. Claims go up. Insurers raise premiums to cover it. Rising premiums then get used as proof that you didn’t buy enough cover last time - so you buy more. Which pulls you even further away from ever seeing, let alone questioning, what anything actually costs. Which pushes the bill up again.

Nobody in this chain is being greedy or careless. Everyone’s just doing the sensible thing given what is in front of them. And yet the end result doesn’t work for anyone - not the patient, not eventually the insurer either.

That’s slowly changing. More hospitals now issue itemized bills as a matter of course, and a few platforms let you compare a hospital’s charges before you’re even admitted. None of it is a habit yet. But the tools to actually check now exist, which is more than could be said a decade ago.

It helps to know what you’re actually holding. A base policy stacked under a much larger top-up isn’t the same as one policy for the combined amount - the top-up often only activates once a threshold is crossed per claim, not cumulatively across the year. A two-to-four year waiting period on pre-existing conditions is standard, not an exception. And a room-rent sub-limit, however generous-sounding, can quietly cap what the rest of the policy pays out, regardless of the headline sum insured.

That number you keep hearing - medical inflation running at twelve, fourteen percent a year - gets treated like weather too. It isn’t. It’s the same loop above, wearing a percentage sign. More on that later in this series.

Start small. Pull out your last renewal notice, read the one line that actually changed - the premium - and ask plainly what drove it. You don’t need to become an actuary. You just need to stop being the only party in the transaction who never asks.

None of this means don’t insure, or that the real improvements in Indian health insurance don’t count. They do. But a bigger number was never the whole answer. Insurance is meant for the disaster you couldn’t have seen coming - not the default response to every bill.

That is what the rest of this series will trace: how much you actually need to insure, why a headline sum insured can quietly hide a huge gap, what “medical inflation” is really measuring, why a premium you can afford at 45 might not be one you can afford at 60, and what an insurer is really promising you when it says “unlimited.”

Same method every time - follow the incentive, not just the symptom.

The moment cover becomes the default answer for every bill, it stops being a safety net and starts being fuel. The real risk in health insurance was never being underinsured - it’s being disinterested in what you’re actually paying for.

When did you last actually read your own hospital bill, or your own premium renewal notice, line by line?

1/7 - Rethinking Health Insurance

Back to Writing